Digital Evolution and Genocide (part 1)
"If the Negro could be eliminated from America or greatly decreased in numbers, this would meet the white's approval ... all possible policies ... to decrease the Negro population are blocked ... except birth control ... birth control facilities could be extended relatively more to Negroes than to whites" An American Dilemma, Gunnar Myrdal and Arnold Rose (1944)
A plan was developed by Gunnar Myrdal and Arnold Rose in 1944 to commit a genocide against the African-Americans; the plan became a conspiracy, the secret agenda of those highest in the population control movement; carried out because they believed in eugenics. Eugenics has its roots in the slave trade where Francis Galton's family made their money; it is strong because Charles Darwin gave it his support. A theory of evolution could be gradual or abrupt, analog or digital but only a gradual or analog theory of evolution like that of Darwin or the new synthetic theory of evolution offers eugenics support; current discoveries in biology support a digital theory of evolution like that proposed by Professor Irene Manton; the involvement of the richest foundations in America in the genocide plan not only began and keeps the genocide going but their grantmaking power suppresses the truth that evolution is digital and eugenics as false as it is cruel.
Part One
The story is of a conspiracy to commit genocide against the African-Americans. The plan was developed, written down and published by Gunnar Myrdal and Arnold Rose in the book, An American Dilemma (1944) in Chapter Seven. The book is widely distributed and anyone may find it and read Chapter Seven. Myrdal and Rose claimed in this chapter that American whites wanted a genocide against the African-Americans but were blocked by their value system - this was the dilemma. The two proposed a solution, saying:
"If the Negro could be eliminated from America or greatly decreased in numbers, this would meet the white's approval ... all possible policies ... to decrease the Negro population are blocked ... except birth control ... [In America there are] valuations centered on the health and happiness of the individual parents and children ... the full possibilities of these latter valuations [centered on individual health and happiness] in permitting a birth control policy in America have not yet been fully realised ... Under their sanction birth control facilities could be extended relatively more to Negroes than to whites since Negroes are more concentrated in the lower income and education classes... even an extreme birth control program is warranted [among African-Americans]... by reasons of individual and social welfare"
Arnold and Rose admit elsewhere in the book that they had no real evidence that American whites wanted a genocide - one assumes those they knew wanted one.
AS we see, the plan was to use the the increased African-American access to medicine which would be a consequence of civil rights by presenting access to birth control as health and a quality-of-life issue. This apparently harmless action would result in African-Americans using birth control disproportionately without coercion. And that would result - as planned - in a genocide.
This plan was carried into action in the Fifties and Sixties by the leaders in the field of constitutional interpretation and population control who had worked on An American Dilemma (Chapter Seven), and knew the plan. The most important of these were Arnold Rose for Constitutional interpretation) and Frederick Osborn, Frank Notestein and Dudley Kirk of the Population Council. Their chief agents were John D. Rockefeller III, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America plus eugenic society members.
Arnold Rose developed a theory of constitutional interpretation which holds that the law makes the people - and social scientists (the ss) make the law by telling judges what the people should be. Rose's theory was first applied in Brown v. Board of Education - the great desegregation decision. Naturally I support desegregation - it is the way the operative decision was reasoned out and the consequences of allowing that kind of reasoning that I am commenting on. For it has been well said: "this is the last and greatest treason - to do the right deed for the wrong reason". The result was to burnish the civil rights credentials of Arnold Rose and his type of reasoning. Then this reasoning was used to further the genocide. The real significance of the theory was that it allowed a tiny group to override the people, their laws, their legislatures and even the Constitution. Only nine men had to be persuaded that they were brilliant an progressive and any law imaginable could be "emananted."
Those who were interested in trying to persuade judges to overthrow the Constitution so there could be a genocide were eugenicists. We will discuss them in more detail later; the key here is that eugenicists do not believe all men are created equal.
In the concrete case of the arguments made in the birth control cases we see a supreme piece of audacity - the the use of anti-eugenic Court decisions to further eugenics. They hit upon the happy idea of using the decisions against their previous plans in the field of reproduction - segregation laws, anti-miscegenation laws, sterilization laws - to shield the Myrdal plan. This was possible because the anti-eugenic decisions related to government-sponsored eugenic programs like coercive sterilization while the eugenicists did not want to work through government coercion - they had the Myrdal plan. Thus we find both Skinner v. Oklahoma and Love v. Virginia cited in Roe v. Wade. as precedents showing that the government is not supposed to interfer in reproductive decisions. It would have been more correct to say that the government is not supposed to sponsor eugenic programs fostering human inequality. No past decisions spoke to the constitutionality of the Myrdal plan but obviously if the government is not supposed to sponsor eugenic programs this does not mean it is precluded from defending its poorer citizens against them. Had the debate proceeded on those lines, had the true issues been debated, the debate and its outcome would have been different. As it was the eugenicists proceeded by way of the Supreme Court to strike down every right or protection in the field of reproduction except the one right needed for the genocide - unlimited access to all forms of birth control, unlimited rights to use them. The rights of the unborn, father rights, parental rights, the rights of minors to protection, medical responsibilities, individual responsibilities, community rights and responsibilities - all disappeared over a space of thirty years.
Next to Arnold Rose in importance in implementing the plan were Frederick Osborn, Frank Notesein and Dudley Kirk who founded and set the direction of the Population Council. The president of the Population Council in its early years was John D. Rockefeller III so it was untouchable and the Council became the most important organizing force in the early years of the field of population control. The direction it set was the direction others followed and the direction it set was to implement the Myrdal plan. The captain-general of iniquity was Frederick Osborn in his position as operational head of the Population Council at its founding (1952-59) while he was also President of the American Eugenics Society. He was followed as President of the Population Council (1959-68) by Frank Notestein, a director of the American Eugenics Society. Dudley Kirkwas head of the DEmographic Division of the Population Council from its inception in 1954 to 1967. These three had been associated with An American Dilemma, Chapter Seven and they worked to mould the approach taken by the Population Council so that it matched the prescriptions of the plan. Later entrants to the field, such as The Ford Foundation and the government took their cue from the Population Council thus ultimately fom Chapter Seven in An American Dilemma. All agreed that unrestricted unlimited access to various forms of birth control was a civil right necessary to improve quality of life - and this blinkered approach to human reproduction amounted to signing on to the plan. Planned Parenthood Federation of America was organized in 1942 by eugenicists like Margaret Sanger to improve the racial quality of the average American citizen. It or its physicians were involved in most of the Court cases on different birth control issues and it runs most of the "non-profit" birth control or abortion clinics in or near African-American areas.
There would have been changes in the birth control laws just as there would have been changes in the civil rights laws. It is due to the eugenicists, Osborn, Notestein, Kirk and the PPFA leaders like Margaret Sanger, that the changes were knotted together into a genocide.
And the plan is working. From the start African-Americans used birth control disproportionatley. When they were 11 percent of the population they were 24 percent of the abortions. This percentage has climbed; they are now 34 percent of all abortions and the figure is still rising. In the District of Columbia 65 percent of the children conceived to African-Americans are aborted. I have been told that African - Americans are only 5 percent of the US population under the age of five. If this is true, in a sense, the genocide has already happened.
The problem is that the African-American family structure has been shattered. Children aren't wanted. No nation, tribe, clan, race - no group can survive not wanting and not having children. Extinction is just a question of time. Only the churches could pull African-Americans back from the abyss but they have tied their fortunes to that section of the Democratic party which hates both religion and the family. It's a question of values. Only the churches in today's world have the values that build families but African-Americans are politically tied to a left ideology that loathes churches, values and families. Men and women are not "breeders" and will not have children unless they see a value in it. That won't come from left-oriented groups.
(to be continued)
This post was published first but fell off this blog somehow. So now it's out of order. Sorry, I'm new at this)
A plan was developed by Gunnar Myrdal and Arnold Rose in 1944 to commit a genocide against the African-Americans; the plan became a conspiracy, the secret agenda of those highest in the population control movement; carried out because they believed in eugenics. Eugenics has its roots in the slave trade where Francis Galton's family made their money; it is strong because Charles Darwin gave it his support. A theory of evolution could be gradual or abrupt, analog or digital but only a gradual or analog theory of evolution like that of Darwin or the new synthetic theory of evolution offers eugenics support; current discoveries in biology support a digital theory of evolution like that proposed by Professor Irene Manton; the involvement of the richest foundations in America in the genocide plan not only began and keeps the genocide going but their grantmaking power suppresses the truth that evolution is digital and eugenics as false as it is cruel.
Part One
The story is of a conspiracy to commit genocide against the African-Americans. The plan was developed, written down and published by Gunnar Myrdal and Arnold Rose in the book, An American Dilemma (1944) in Chapter Seven. The book is widely distributed and anyone may find it and read Chapter Seven. Myrdal and Rose claimed in this chapter that American whites wanted a genocide against the African-Americans but were blocked by their value system - this was the dilemma. The two proposed a solution, saying:
"If the Negro could be eliminated from America or greatly decreased in numbers, this would meet the white's approval ... all possible policies ... to decrease the Negro population are blocked ... except birth control ... [In America there are] valuations centered on the health and happiness of the individual parents and children ... the full possibilities of these latter valuations [centered on individual health and happiness] in permitting a birth control policy in America have not yet been fully realised ... Under their sanction birth control facilities could be extended relatively more to Negroes than to whites since Negroes are more concentrated in the lower income and education classes... even an extreme birth control program is warranted [among African-Americans]... by reasons of individual and social welfare"
Arnold and Rose admit elsewhere in the book that they had no real evidence that American whites wanted a genocide - one assumes those they knew wanted one.
AS we see, the plan was to use the the increased African-American access to medicine which would be a consequence of civil rights by presenting access to birth control as health and a quality-of-life issue. This apparently harmless action would result in African-Americans using birth control disproportionately without coercion. And that would result - as planned - in a genocide.
This plan was carried into action in the Fifties and Sixties by the leaders in the field of constitutional interpretation and population control who had worked on An American Dilemma (Chapter Seven), and knew the plan. The most important of these were Arnold Rose for Constitutional interpretation) and Frederick Osborn, Frank Notestein and Dudley Kirk of the Population Council. Their chief agents were John D. Rockefeller III, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America plus eugenic society members.
Arnold Rose developed a theory of constitutional interpretation which holds that the law makes the people - and social scientists (the ss) make the law by telling judges what the people should be. Rose's theory was first applied in Brown v. Board of Education - the great desegregation decision. Naturally I support desegregation - it is the way the operative decision was reasoned out and the consequences of allowing that kind of reasoning that I am commenting on. For it has been well said: "this is the last and greatest treason - to do the right deed for the wrong reason". The result was to burnish the civil rights credentials of Arnold Rose and his type of reasoning. Then this reasoning was used to further the genocide. The real significance of the theory was that it allowed a tiny group to override the people, their laws, their legislatures and even the Constitution. Only nine men had to be persuaded that they were brilliant an progressive and any law imaginable could be "emananted."
Those who were interested in trying to persuade judges to overthrow the Constitution so there could be a genocide were eugenicists. We will discuss them in more detail later; the key here is that eugenicists do not believe all men are created equal.
In the concrete case of the arguments made in the birth control cases we see a supreme piece of audacity - the the use of anti-eugenic Court decisions to further eugenics. They hit upon the happy idea of using the decisions against their previous plans in the field of reproduction - segregation laws, anti-miscegenation laws, sterilization laws - to shield the Myrdal plan. This was possible because the anti-eugenic decisions related to government-sponsored eugenic programs like coercive sterilization while the eugenicists did not want to work through government coercion - they had the Myrdal plan. Thus we find both Skinner v. Oklahoma and Love v. Virginia cited in Roe v. Wade. as precedents showing that the government is not supposed to interfer in reproductive decisions. It would have been more correct to say that the government is not supposed to sponsor eugenic programs fostering human inequality. No past decisions spoke to the constitutionality of the Myrdal plan but obviously if the government is not supposed to sponsor eugenic programs this does not mean it is precluded from defending its poorer citizens against them. Had the debate proceeded on those lines, had the true issues been debated, the debate and its outcome would have been different. As it was the eugenicists proceeded by way of the Supreme Court to strike down every right or protection in the field of reproduction except the one right needed for the genocide - unlimited access to all forms of birth control, unlimited rights to use them. The rights of the unborn, father rights, parental rights, the rights of minors to protection, medical responsibilities, individual responsibilities, community rights and responsibilities - all disappeared over a space of thirty years.
Next to Arnold Rose in importance in implementing the plan were Frederick Osborn, Frank Notesein and Dudley Kirk who founded and set the direction of the Population Council. The president of the Population Council in its early years was John D. Rockefeller III so it was untouchable and the Council became the most important organizing force in the early years of the field of population control. The direction it set was the direction others followed and the direction it set was to implement the Myrdal plan. The captain-general of iniquity was Frederick Osborn in his position as operational head of the Population Council at its founding (1952-59) while he was also President of the American Eugenics Society. He was followed as President of the Population Council (1959-68) by Frank Notestein, a director of the American Eugenics Society. Dudley Kirkwas head of the DEmographic Division of the Population Council from its inception in 1954 to 1967. These three had been associated with An American Dilemma, Chapter Seven and they worked to mould the approach taken by the Population Council so that it matched the prescriptions of the plan. Later entrants to the field, such as The Ford Foundation and the government took their cue from the Population Council thus ultimately fom Chapter Seven in An American Dilemma. All agreed that unrestricted unlimited access to various forms of birth control was a civil right necessary to improve quality of life - and this blinkered approach to human reproduction amounted to signing on to the plan. Planned Parenthood Federation of America was organized in 1942 by eugenicists like Margaret Sanger to improve the racial quality of the average American citizen. It or its physicians were involved in most of the Court cases on different birth control issues and it runs most of the "non-profit" birth control or abortion clinics in or near African-American areas.
There would have been changes in the birth control laws just as there would have been changes in the civil rights laws. It is due to the eugenicists, Osborn, Notestein, Kirk and the PPFA leaders like Margaret Sanger, that the changes were knotted together into a genocide.
And the plan is working. From the start African-Americans used birth control disproportionatley. When they were 11 percent of the population they were 24 percent of the abortions. This percentage has climbed; they are now 34 percent of all abortions and the figure is still rising. In the District of Columbia 65 percent of the children conceived to African-Americans are aborted. I have been told that African - Americans are only 5 percent of the US population under the age of five. If this is true, in a sense, the genocide has already happened.
The problem is that the African-American family structure has been shattered. Children aren't wanted. No nation, tribe, clan, race - no group can survive not wanting and not having children. Extinction is just a question of time. Only the churches could pull African-Americans back from the abyss but they have tied their fortunes to that section of the Democratic party which hates both religion and the family. It's a question of values. Only the churches in today's world have the values that build families but African-Americans are politically tied to a left ideology that loathes churches, values and families. Men and women are not "breeders" and will not have children unless they see a value in it. That won't come from left-oriented groups.
(to be continued)
This post was published first but fell off this blog somehow. So now it's out of order. Sorry, I'm new at this)
posted by wildswan at 8/10/2006 06:55:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home